Aesthetics of Discomfort and Theory of Abjection
From ancient civilizations to the grotesque, and to contemporary performance artists, art that causes physical discomfort can be found everywhere. Typically, body, flesh, or bodily fluids are directly used, although textures or objects can also evoke repulsion.
My aim is to interpret some artworks using Julia Kristeva's theory of the abject, which analyses the psychological roots of disgust.
"The abject is what disrupts identity, system, and order. It does not respect borders, positions, rules.''
Not violent as others, Marina & Ulay's Imponderabilia (1977) can evoke the abject for some, in a completely different way by trespassing the boundary between "private" and "public''. The abject can be experienced through intangible things, like moral values, explains Kristeva. According to this interesting study, people with conservative political views are more likely to be sensitive to physical disgusting things.
Frida Kahlo, The Broken Column
The display of her anatomy confronts us with abjection by disrupting the consistency of the self.
Abjection establishes the infant's identity, by separating from the mother's body on an individual level, and from the animal on a social level. Kristeva sees animal sacrifice as a symbolic act that reinforces this separation.
Skin is our border, what seperates 'us' from the outside world.
Rebecca Horn, Overflowing Blood Machine
This reminds me of a paper that was written for 505 by Ezgi Sürek some years ago:
ReplyDeletehttps://drive.google.com/file/d/1bhfRVBdoIfUTzoBJq8BUY2-GNff5GZXn/view?usp=sharing
You may find it of interest.
I forgot to say that Kristeva's text on the Abject happens to be one of my all time beloved texts - to the point that I used it (in combination with other things, in order to set up a plurality of my own) as the basis for something that I made some years ago: https://abjectavatar.tumblr.com
ReplyDelete